🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.